I've only read page 3 and the only response post on page 4, not sure if this has been mentioned or not but it is the one thing that BURNS my blood the most about this story because it is the FACT. Here it is: The Liberals or those against the 2nd Amendment are using this story as leverage to "Take Back" the recent ruling of legally carrying a loaded weapon in a National Park.
Now who here believes for a second that if it were "ILLEGAL" to carry a loaded weapon into a National Park, that this guy (assuming he is guilty of this allegation) would have stopped at the gate and either 1) turned around or 2) would toss out his weapons or leave them behind so as to not break the law?
This is just BS! Cut and Dry! If the guy would have somehow ran the Park Ranger over with his vehicle, would the same group of liberals asked to ban assault vehicles? You know more people die in & by assault vehicles every day than by loaded weapons!
Signed, Super Pissed Off in MI
RidgeRunner Out